Should we be afraid of AI? Will AI ever replace true art?

Whether AI will replace artists is a complex question with no easy answer. The current thinking for the next few years is this: you will not be replaced by AI, you will be replaced by someone who knows how to use AI.

On the one hand, AI is already being used to create art in a variety of ways. For example, AI-powered tools can generate realistic images, music, and even writing. This could lead to a decrease in the demand for traditional artists, especially in commercial and industrial settings.

On the other hand, art is more than just creating something that is visually appealing or technically proficient. It is also about expressing oneself and connecting with others on an emotional level. AI is not yet capable of doing these things in the same way that human artists can.

Additionally, AI-generated art is often derivative of existing works. It is not clear whether AI will ever be able to create truly original art, or whether it will always be limited to producing variations on existing themes.

Overall, it is likely that AI will have a significant impact on the art world in the coming years. However, it is unlikely that AI will completely replace human artists. Instead, AI will likely be used as a tool by artists to create new and innovative forms of art.

Here are some specific ways that AI is already being used by artists:

• AI-powered tools can be used to generate new ideas and inspiration.

• AI can be used to automate repetitive tasks, such as creating backgrounds or editing images.

• AI can be used to create new and innovative forms of art, such as interactive installations or data-driven paintings.

In the future, AI is likely to play an even greater role in the art world. However, it is important to remember that AI is just a tool. It is up to human artists to decide how to use this tool to create art that is meaningful and inspiring.

Stephanie Dinkins - there is only one Tarantino, Gaga and Mozart

Check out Sherwin Rosen and Economics of Superstars - there are no substitutes.

And this is why BadBunny earned almost $400M iin one year -  in concert sales There are tens of thousands of singers - so damn close and wanna be him and never gonna get it. More on this rant here. 

Sure, there are some people who want mediocre, and that's what AI delivers now.

For analytics, trend finding, identifying cancer cells, sorting through data to find terrorists - sure AI will eat our lunch.

AI Art is not protectable by Copyright (for now)

A US federal judge has just ruled that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted. The ruling, which was handed down on August 18, 2023, is a major setback for computer scientist Stephen Thaler, who had filed a copyright application for an image created by his AI system, DABUS.

In her ruling, Judge Beryl Howell of the US District Court for the District of Columbia said that copyright law requires that a work be the product of "human authorship." She found that DABUS did not meet this requirement, as it was a machine learning algorithm that created the image without any human input.

The ruling is a significant development in the field of IP law, as it raises questions about the copyrightability of works created by AI. It is also likely to have a chilling effect on the development of AI-generated art, as creators may be less likely to invest time and resources in creating works that they cannot protect under copyright law.

The ruling is not the final word on the issue of AI-generated art copyrightability. Thaler has said that he plans to appeal the decision, and it is possible that the ruling could be overturned by a higher court. However, the ruling is a major setback for Thaler and other advocates for AI-generated art copyright protection.

The ruling also raises important questions about the future of IP law in the age of AI. As AI becomes increasingly sophisticated, it is likely that machines will be able to create works that are indistinguishable from those created by humans. This raises the question of whether copyright law should be amended to protect works created by AI.

The ruling in Thaler v. Register of Copyrights is a major development in the field of IP law, and it is likely to have a significant impact on the future of AI-generated art. It is a reminder that copyright law is a complex and evolving area, and that it must be adapted to the changing technological landscape.

Ed Sheeran and Marvin Gaye - What Happened?

In 2017, the heirs of Marvin Gaye sued Ed Sheeran, claiming that his hit song "Thinking Out Loud" copied Gaye's 1973 song "Let's Get It On." The case went to trial in 2023, and after two weeks of testimony, a jury found in favor of Sheeran.

In a heavily contested and watched case, the jury found that Sheeran did not copy Gaye's song, and that the similarities between the two songs were the result of common musical elements and therefore, not deemed as copyright infringement. The verdict was a victory for Sheeran and for the music industry, as it affirmed that artists can be inspired by other artists without fear of being sued for copyright infringement.

The case was closely watched by the music industry, as it had the potential to set a precedent for future copyright infringement cases. The verdict is a relief to artists, who often worry about being sued for copyright infringement even when they are not copying other artists' work. It also sends a message to the music industry that it is important to protect the rights of artists, and that copyright infringement lawsuits should only be brought in cases where there is clear evidence of copying.

Intellectual Property (IP) Law and Media

Intellectual property law for media is a body of law that protects the creative works and ideas that are used in the media industry. This includes copyright, trademark, and patent law.

• Copyright law protects original works of authorship, such as books, movies, music, and software.

• Trademark law protects words, phrases, and symbols that are used to identify the source of goods or services.

• Patent law protects inventions, such as new products or processes.

Intellectual property law is important for the media industry because it helps to protect the investments that are made in creating creative works. Without intellectual property law, it would be much easier for others to copy and profit from these works, which would discourage people from creating new works in the first place.

Intellectual property law is also important for consumers, because it helps to ensure that they have access to high-quality, original content. Without intellectual property law, it would be much easier for others to copy and distribute low-quality, pirated content, which would harm consumers and the media industry alike.

Here are some examples of how intellectual property law is used in the media industry:

• Film studio might register a copyright for its movie script.

• Record label might register a trademark for its band's name.

• Tech company might patent its new software.

By registering their intellectual property, these businesses can take legal action against anyone who infringes on their rights. This helps to protect their investments and ensure that they can continue to create new and innovative works.

Intellectual property law is a complex and ever-evolving field. If you are involved in the media industry, it is important to consult with an attorney to understand your rights and obligations under the law.