Should we be afraid of AI? Will AI ever replace true art?

Whether AI will replace artists is a complex question with no easy answer. The current thinking for the next few years is this: you will not be replaced by AI, you will be replaced by someone who knows how to use AI.

On the one hand, AI is already being used to create art in a variety of ways. For example, AI-powered tools can generate realistic images, music, and even writing. This could lead to a decrease in the demand for traditional artists, especially in commercial and industrial settings.

On the other hand, art is more than just creating something that is visually appealing or technically proficient. It is also about expressing oneself and connecting with others on an emotional level. AI is not yet capable of doing these things in the same way that human artists can.

Additionally, AI-generated art is often derivative of existing works. It is not clear whether AI will ever be able to create truly original art, or whether it will always be limited to producing variations on existing themes.

Overall, it is likely that AI will have a significant impact on the art world in the coming years. However, it is unlikely that AI will completely replace human artists. Instead, AI will likely be used as a tool by artists to create new and innovative forms of art.

Here are some specific ways that AI is already being used by artists:

• AI-powered tools can be used to generate new ideas and inspiration.

• AI can be used to automate repetitive tasks, such as creating backgrounds or editing images.

• AI can be used to create new and innovative forms of art, such as interactive installations or data-driven paintings.

In the future, AI is likely to play an even greater role in the art world. However, it is important to remember that AI is just a tool. It is up to human artists to decide how to use this tool to create art that is meaningful and inspiring.

Stephanie Dinkins - there is only one Tarantino, Gaga and Mozart

Check out Sherwin Rosen and Economics of Superstars - there are no substitutes.

And this is why BadBunny earned almost $400M iin one year -  in concert sales There are tens of thousands of singers - so damn close and wanna be him and never gonna get it. More on this rant here. 

Sure, there are some people who want mediocre, and that's what AI delivers now.

For analytics, trend finding, identifying cancer cells, sorting through data to find terrorists - sure AI will eat our lunch.

AI Art is not protectable by Copyright (for now)

A US federal judge has just ruled that AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted. The ruling, which was handed down on August 18, 2023, is a major setback for computer scientist Stephen Thaler, who had filed a copyright application for an image created by his AI system, DABUS.

In her ruling, Judge Beryl Howell of the US District Court for the District of Columbia said that copyright law requires that a work be the product of "human authorship." She found that DABUS did not meet this requirement, as it was a machine learning algorithm that created the image without any human input.

The ruling is a significant development in the field of IP law, as it raises questions about the copyrightability of works created by AI. It is also likely to have a chilling effect on the development of AI-generated art, as creators may be less likely to invest time and resources in creating works that they cannot protect under copyright law.

The ruling is not the final word on the issue of AI-generated art copyrightability. Thaler has said that he plans to appeal the decision, and it is possible that the ruling could be overturned by a higher court. However, the ruling is a major setback for Thaler and other advocates for AI-generated art copyright protection.

The ruling also raises important questions about the future of IP law in the age of AI. As AI becomes increasingly sophisticated, it is likely that machines will be able to create works that are indistinguishable from those created by humans. This raises the question of whether copyright law should be amended to protect works created by AI.

The ruling in Thaler v. Register of Copyrights is a major development in the field of IP law, and it is likely to have a significant impact on the future of AI-generated art. It is a reminder that copyright law is a complex and evolving area, and that it must be adapted to the changing technological landscape.